Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stayton, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stayton, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 6, No. 4, 271-285 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1524838005277439
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Mutable Influences on Intimate Partner Abuse Screening in Health Care Settings

A Synthesis of the Literature

Catherine D. Stayton

Brooklyn College, City University of New York

Mary M. Duncan

University of Connecticut Health Center

For more than a decade, professional medical and nursing associations have recommended universal screening for intimate partner abuse (IPA). This review of 44 studies examines IPA screening during this period. The purposes of the review are to (a) identify mutable influences on IPA screening, (b) summarize what is known about altering these influences, and (c) outline an agenda for improving IPA screening. Evidence to date indicates that screening is not universal. Promising approaches to improvement start with provider training and relatively simple environmental adjustments. Unanswered empirical questions include "What are the essential components of effective training? Which health care providers are best positioned to screen under which circumstances? Which of the untested mutable influences will further improve IPA screening practice?" The review leads to the following practice recommendations: (a) Interventions should focus on clinicians in training (e.g., medical residents), and (b) screening approaches must be tailored to various practice settings.

Key Words: intimate partner abuse • screening • guideline adherence • medical education • domestic violence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
T. B. Bent-Goodley
Health Disparities and Violence Against Women: Why and How Cultural and Societal Influences Matter
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2007; 8(2): 90 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
S. B. Plichta
Interactions Between Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women and the Health Care System: Policy and Practice Implications
Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2007; 8(2): 226 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]