Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Understanding Denial in Sexual Offenders

A Review of Cognitive and Motivational Processes to Avoid Responsibility

Sandra L. Schneider

Robert C. Wright

University of South Florida

Treatment of sexual offenders is routinely complicated by the presence of denial. This article examines how denial is related to the willingness to take responsibility for offense-related thoughts and actions and how conceptualizations of denial have developed and changed over time. Multiple facets of denial are described in detail, along with an assessment of how different forms of denial undermine acceptance of responsibility throughout treatment. Evidence is presented to show that resistance and denial often hinge on cognitive and motivational processes that are commonly accepted as fundamental treatment targets rather than treatment obstacles. The authors propose that denial may be best understood as the acceptance of explanations that reduce accountability and are reinforced by distorted beliefs and self-deceptive thinking processes. The article concludes with a discussion of the rich clinical information embedded in different expressions of denial and the benefits of treatment strategies designed to assess and work through them.

Key Words: denial • accountability • responsibility • cognitive distortions • explanations • refutation • minimization • depersonalization • FoSOD

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 5, No. 1, 3-20 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1524838003259320


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clinical Case StudiesHome page
J. Ware and W.L. Marshall
Treatment Engagement With a Sexual Offender Who Denies Committing the Offense
Clinical Case Studies, December 1, 2008; 7(6): 592 - 603.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Correct Health CareHome page
A. Moster, D. W. Wnuk, and E. L. Jeglic
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Interventions With Sex Offenders
Journal of Correctional Health Care, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 109 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. M. Langton, H. E. Barbaree, L. Harkins, T. Arenovich, J. Mcnamee, E. J. Peacock, A. Dalton, K. T. Hansen, D. Luong, and H. Marcon
Denial and Minimization Among Sexual Offenders: Posttreatment Presentation and Association With Sexual Recidivism
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2008; 35(1): 69 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]