Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barata, P.
Right arrow Articles by Senn, C. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barata, P.
Right arrow Articles by Senn, C. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 4, No. 1, 3-21 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1524838002238943

When Two Fields Collide

An Examination of the Assumptions of Social Science Research and Law Within the Domain of Domestic Violence

Paula Barata

Charlene Y. Senn

University of Windsor

Feminist theorists in law and the social sciences have questioned the appropriateness of using the methods of their disciplines as tools for bettering the lives of women who have experienced domestic violence. The authors begin with a brief review of the major feminist critiques within these two domains. They explore the assumptions on which both are based and provide examples of how well-meaning attempts to use these disciplines in the area of domestic violence have fallen short of their goals. They then show how the problematic assumptions of both disciplines may be worsened when research on domestic violence is done within the context of the criminal justice system using the example of the mandatory arrest experiments. They conclude that research and the law should come together only under conditions where feminist critiques are taken seriously and the perspectives of women who are the victims of these offenses are placed at the center of the work.

Key Words: domestic violence • research • policy • law • feminist critique


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
R. K. Unger
Afterword: From Inside and Out: Reflecting on a Feminist Politics of Gender in Psychology
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2007; 17(4): 487 - 494.
[PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
J. Miller
A specification of the types of intimate partner violence experienced by women in the general population.
Violence Against Women, December 1, 2006; 12(12): 1105 - 1131.
[Abstract] [PDF]