Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOLEN, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BOLEN, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Guardian Support of Sexually Abused Children

A Definition in Search of a Construct

REBECCA M. BOLEN

Boston University

The support provided by the nonoffending guardian of a sexually abused child after disclosure is a critical consideration. Although a number of studies have assessed guardian support after disclosure, no known article has closely examined the construct of guardian support. The purpose of this article is to consider how the construct of guardian support is defined and operationalized, as well as to consider its intervening variables. This analysis found that approximately 75% of non-offending guardians are partially or fully supportive after disclosure. The four primary groups of intervening variables for guardian support appear to be grouped within immediate stressors or buffers, the child's previous abuse history, the believability of the disclosure, and the guardian's relationship with the offender. More problematic is the definition of guardian support across most studies, which is seldom grounded in theoretical literature but instead appears to be driven by the needs of the child protection system.

Key Words: child sexual abuse • guardian support • maternal support

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 3, No. 1, 40-67 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/15248380020031003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
R. M. Bolen and J. Leah Lamb
Can Nonoffending Mothers of Sexually Abused Children Be Both Ambivalent and Supportive?
Child Maltreat, May 1, 2007; 12(2): 191 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
R. M. Bolen and J. L. Lamb
Ambivalence of Nonoffending Guardians after Child Sexual Abuse Disclosure
J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2004; 19(2): 185 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
R. M. Bolen
Nonoffending Mothers of Sexually Abused Children: A Case of Institutionalized Sexism?
Violence Against Women, November 1, 2003; 9(11): 1336 - 1366.
[Abstract] [PDF]