| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1524838000001003002 Questioning the Child WitnessWhat Can We Conclude from the Research Thus Far?University of California, Irvine
University of California, Davis
University of California, Davis
Stanford University In recent years, increasing numbers of studies have investigated children's memory, suggestibility, and false event reports. The purpose of this article is to highlight key findings from and implications of this research for interviewing child witnesses. First, developmental changes in children's memory and suggestibility are discussed. Second, theory and research concerning relations between emotional distress and children's memory are reviewed, with an emphasis on methodological differences that have led to varied results across studies. Third is a description of factors associated with the context of an interview that may influence children's susceptibility to false suggestions. Fourth, recent studies are described concerning individual differences in children's mnemonic capabilities, suggestibility, and false memories. At the end of the article, recommendations are provided about what can and cannot be concluded from research on questioning child witnesses.
Key Words: children eyewitness testimony false memory individual differences memory stress suggestibility
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
