Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by QUAS, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by REDLICH, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by QUAS, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by REDLICH, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 1, No. 3, 223-249 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1524838000001003002

Questioning the Child Witness

What Can We Conclude from the Research Thus Far?

JODI A. QUAS

University of California, Irvine

GAIL S. GOODMAN

University of California, Davis

SIMONA GHETTI

University of California, Davis

ALLISON D. REDLICH

Stanford University

In recent years, increasing numbers of studies have investigated children's memory, suggestibility, and false event reports. The purpose of this article is to highlight key findings from and implications of this research for interviewing child witnesses. First, developmental changes in children's memory and suggestibility are discussed. Second, theory and research concerning relations between emotional distress and children's memory are reviewed, with an emphasis on methodological differences that have led to varied results across studies. Third is a description of factors associated with the context of an interview that may influence children's susceptibility to false suggestions. Fourth, recent studies are described concerning individual differences in children's mnemonic capabilities, suggestibility, and false memories. At the end of the article, recommendations are provided about what can and cannot be concluded from research on questioning child witnesses.

Key Words: children • eyewitness testimony • false memory • individual differences • memory • stress • suggestibility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
C. M. Tang
Developmentally Sensitive Forensic Interviewing of Preschool Children: Some Guidelines Drawn From Basic Psychological Research
Criminal Justice Review, June 1, 2006; 31(2): 132 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]